PERFORMANS MAGAZİN : BUSİNESS REVIEW

How Well Do You Know Your Customer?

Do You Knowwho your customers are?

Do You Know if you have an effective business strategy that answers the needs of your customers?

Do You Knowif your management team is working on the same page?

Do You Knowhow long you’ve got until your customer switches to your competitor?

21 Ocak 2011 Cuma



The 5th annual World Mining Investment Congress is the mining conference where CEOs examine mining investment and the opportunities that exist in tomorrow’s mining industry.

Register to attend the Congress » See full conference programme » Register to attend the Congress»

Come to World Mining Investment Congress and learn:
How to meet the newest and biggest Chinese investors
About new exploration opportunities
How to meet emerging market miners from India, Russia and more
How to build business relationships with the investors which can fund your future plans

How to understand the best plan of action in response to wider commodities forecasts
What the new investors in the sector are looking for
How to plan your strategy for the M&A market
How to get the best exposure to emerging markets


World class CRM solution providers attend:
Because the World Mining Investment Congress is where the world's mining companies come to find solutions and ideas. If you are in the business of providing world-class solutions you need to be here. The congress is:

A marketing solution that generates new business
Attended by decision makers
An unrivalled and cost-effective sales and profile solution


The World Mining Investment Congress 2011 focus:
Secure finance from the major investment sources: Private Equity, Hedge Funds, Equities Investors, Specialist Resource Funds
Get face-to-face time with investors, majors and Governments in one place at one time

Get your project on the radar of global mining investors
There are limited sponsorship opportunities. To discuss in detail your requirements and the show contact Colin Carter at colin.carter@terrapinn.com

Doğan ORMANKIRAN

27 Mayıs 2008 Salı

U.S. Nuclear Power Plants 2008


Nuclear power is a type of nuclear technology involving the controlled use of nuclear reactions, usually nuclear fission, to release energy for work including propulsion, heat, and the generation of electricity. Nuclear energy is produced by a controlled nuclear chain reaction and creates heat - which is used to boil water, produce steam, and drive a steam turbine.

A nuclear reactor is a device in which nuclear chain reactions are initiated, controlled, and sustained at a steady rate, as opposed to a nuclear bomb, in which the chain reaction occurs in a fraction of a second and is uncontrolled causing an explosion.

The most significant use of nuclear reactors is as an energy source for the generation of electrical power and for the power in some ships. This is usually accomplished by methods that involve using heat from the nuclear reaction to power steam turbines.

The United States produces the most nuclear energy, with nuclear power providing 20% of the electricity it consumes, while France produces the highest percentage of its electrical energy from nuclear reactors - 80% as of 2006. In the European Union as a whole, nuclear energy provides 30% of the electricity. Nuclear energy policy differs between European Union countries, and some, such as Austria and Ireland, have no active nuclear power stations. In comparison, France has a large number of these plants, with 16 multi-unit stations in current use.

Analysis of the Major Nuclear Power Plants in the United States takes a view of the overall nuclear power industry worldwide, with an analysis of the basics of nuclear power, and an overview of the nuclear power industry in the United States. The report focuses on the major nuclear power plants in the U.S. – over 75 plants are focused upon in this report.

WORLD MINING INVESTMENT CONGRESS 2008


World Mining Investment Congress 2008
The Hotel Russell, London
3 - 5 June 2008


He mining conference where CEOs examine mining investment and the challenges and opportunities that exist in tomorrow’s mining industry.

The future of resource events
The World Mining Investment Congress is an executive forum for the world’s mining industry. In a crowded calendar of mining conferences, expos and investor symposiums the Congress stands out as a meeting place where genuine discussions take place around the big challenges, investments and opportunities in mining.

The Congress is more than an investor symposium. It is more than a series of advisory solutions. It is a platform for the industry to talk about growth, development and opportunity, as well as, investment and return. Here is what makes the Congress so unique:

  • Industry pioneers explore today’s mining industry: key drivers, what challenges they face and what the future holds for mines
  • Executive level delegates: an event full of decision makers
  • CEOs gather to address the major issues impacting their business, informing you of what strategies and processes they have adopted to ensure high shareholder value, return and profit
  • Leading banks, brokers and equity investors explore the best methods for raising capital
  • The world’s most respected service providers detail new and emerging solutions now available to mines to help them do better business
  • The investment community have their say on how best to attract investor interest and where they will be placing their money
  • The majority of speakers at the Congress are mines
  • A series of parallel roundtables run by industry thought leaders designed to further more focussed discussion on key challenges impacting the growth and development of mines companies
  • Extensive networking opportunities so you can continually meet and develop new business relationships

The Congress promotes communication and interaction, delivering content and delivering discussion. It is specifically designed to deliver attendees new business leads, new investment and new ideas.

3 Mart 2008 Pazartesi

Panasonic VIERA P905iTV mobile TV cellphone video demo


After last week’s price war, all breath was suitably baited this week for Sprint’s answer to the multiple $99.99 “unlimited talk” plans its rivals offered. And despite disappointed suspicions that the beleaguered CDMA carrier would throw caution to the wind with a $60 offering, in actual fact their Simply Everything plan - which includes talk, messaging, data, internet access, Sprint TV, Sprint Music, GPS and PTT for $99.99 a month - has neatly slotted in as perhaps the best available in the US right now. Little comfort for investors, though; the same day Sprint announced almost $30bn in losses this quarter, and froze dividends.

Helio also had some financial shakiness, with analysts only taking a measured view of their mounting debts ($560m over three years) because of their record 264-percent revenue growth. Ironically, over in the GSM camp things are looking far more rosy; T-Mobile finally announced their full 2007 performance including a healthy $4.4bn service revenue.

Apple seized headlines early in the week with an invitation to a special iPhone SDK event on March 6th - PHONE Magazine will be there live blogging all the announcements, so set your alarm to 10am PST and join us then! - amid rumors that while Exchange support would be introduced, the long-awaited software development toolkit has been further delayed. Current suspicions point to a beta release this coming week but a delay of the full package until the WWDC this Summer. There’s also talk of just how resolute Apple’s grip on aftermarket apps will be; after initial fears that they would insist on validating each program themselves, releasing them solely through iTunes, it now looks as though free software will go unchecked while they extract a tithe from paid software.

Meanwhile, the iPhone got a firmware update to 1.1.4 (comprising simly bug-fixes) launched in its fifth market, Ireland, with carrier O2 offering the worst set of tariffs to-date. Out of everything, the absence of unlimited EDGE could make Ireland the most expensive place to own the iconic cellphone.

As for other handsets, PHONE Magazine brought you an exclusive video of the NTT DoCoMo handset everybody was talking about - Panasonic’s mobile TV-capable VIERA P905iTV - while Garmin’s nuvifone got the company into some hot litigious water thanks to a trademark suit from PBX specialists Nuvio.

Finally, our Week in Review wouldn’t be complete without the latest in the ongoing Motorola saga; this time, the ailing US manufacturer saw its expectation rating slashed by analysts Oppenheimer from “outperform” to just “perform”, taking with it 4-percent of their stock value. How long before the company tries to appeal to the patriotic vote, do you think? “Buy US, kids - buy Motorola!”

6 Şubat 2008 Çarşamba

Debtor Nation

Despite his pledges to curb federal spending, President Bush will leave office next year with an eye-popping federal deficit that tops $400 billion. And that's just one of the shocking revelations in the president's $3.1 trillion budget request to Congress for fiscal year 2009, which the White House unveiled Monday.

The president has proposed to freeze or cut 151 discretionary programs, as well as make drastic reforms to entitlement programs--including a $178 billion cut for Medicare over the next five years.

"Good intentions alone do not justify a program that is not working," Bush said in his budget message.

Most of Bush's proposals are non-starters. A Democratic Congress is going to delay acting on his final budget request for as long as possible. For that reason, the deficit increase is immediately grabbing headlines. For 2008, the federal deficit is expected to soar to $410 billion, up from $162 billion in 2007. The reasons: A projected $146 billion stimulus plan to invigorate the economy, a one-year plan to keep the Alternative Minimum Tax from drastically expanding and reduced corporate tax receipts.

Still, Bush says his proposal will balance the federal budget by 2012. The White House wants to cap non-security discretionary spending at less than 1% growth for 2009, then hold it at that level through 2013. And it plans to drastically reform and cut spending on many discretionary programs, including elimination of Social Services Block Grants and the Perkins loan program. The proposal would also reform the disability insurance program. The White House estimates that these measures would save $18 billion in 2009.

The budget proposes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts Bush championed be made permanent. It also includes a $515.4 billion non-war defense budget, a modest increase over last year. From 2001 to 2007, "security spending" (which includes funding for the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security) increased 48%, the White House says. The fiscal-year 2009 budget would increase this spending by another 8.2%

Reform of entitlement programs is expected to save $16 billion in 2009 and $208 billion over the next five years, the White House says. As much as $178 billion of this savings would come from Medicare reductions. The president also wants to implement a standard health insurance tax deduction of $7,500 per person, a deviation from the current tax exclusion for employer-sponsored insurance.

In an echo of a past policy failure, Bush proposed that Social Security be reformed to allow workers to use up to 4% of their Social Security earnings to fund personal retirement accounts. The contributions, which would begin in 2013, would be capped at $1,400 during their first year and would be allowed to gradually increase until 2018.

The president's request Monday is the first step in what is likely to be a protracted battle over spending in an election year, when politicians like to ruffle as few voter feathers as possible and demonize opponents as much as they can. If Democrats in Congress don't pass appropriations bills by the Sept. 30 deadline, they can always pass a "continuing resolution" to fund the government at current levels until a new president takes office, and they're betting that person is going to be a Democrat. That gives lawmakers leverage in putting their own budget proposals into place.

In other words, Congress' reaction to this budget will be a gauge of Bush's status as a lame-duck president.

Credit Crisis: Where Was The SEC?


02.06.08, 6:00 AM ET

Six years after the lessons of Enron and a decade after Long-Term Capital collapsed, regulators still can't seem to blunt the damage complex securities can have on financial markets. Why?

It's a fair question. Investment banks, mortgage brokers and ratings agencies are all being blamed for the subprime mortgage bubble and its sudden and stunning demise. But little has been said about the watchdogs at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the regulators who oversee the activities of the banks. They have the power to stop fraud in the business of selling the complex credit derivatives, and they have jurisdiction over whether the complex securities sold by the banks met suitability requirements for the investors who bought them. Yet time and again, they've failed to do so.

Most notably, the SEC has the power to monitor whether the investment banks had adequate capital relative to their trading positions and balance sheets and the proper risk management systems to prevent catastrophic losses. More than $100 billion in write-downs later, several banks are scrounging for capital, and it's clear those risk management procedures weren't functioning very well, if at all.

One of the problems is the lack of clear information, outside the banks and trading floors, about the credit derivatives market. Collateralized debt obligations (CDO) and other structured finance products trade over-the-counter rather than on an exchange, at least in the United States. Many of them trade infrequently, meaning price information is limited.

Washington and Wall Street have been hesitant to clamp down on the over-the-counter market, the source of much profit-making. Last year, as the subprime market began its collapse, the President's Working Group, which includes the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve, the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, recommended against tighter oversight of the over-the-counter market, in the context of vetoing tighter regulation of hedge funds, saying the industry can self-police.

A counterparty risk group led by former New York Fed President Gerald Corrigan has also recommended industry "best practices" in lieu of tighter regulation of the derivatives trading market.

Leaving it up to Wall Street hasn't proven very effective, however. "The decision by the President's Working Group to recommend no detailed regulation of the over-the-counter market was wrong," says David Ruder, a former SEC chairman and now law professor at Northwestern University.

Regulators are taking a hard look at how banks structured, priced and sold mortgage-laden securities, but by the estimate of some it's too little and too late. "I don't think all the king's horses and all the king's men will put this together again," says Gary Aguirre, a former SEC lawyer.

There were warning signs.

In the summer of 2006, Jeff Kronthal, a senior executive in Merrill Lynch's (nyse: MER - news - people ) structured products group, was fired after reportedly balking at then-Chief Executive Stanley O'Neal's demands that the firm get more aggressive in its risk-taking with mortgage securities. Kronthal was hired back by new Chief Executive John Thain in December to advise on the firm's risk management.

He wasn't the only one to sound alarms about the housing bubble and the explosion of the credit derivatives market. "Many credible people were public about their dissatisfaction with the mortgage loan market," says Janet Tavakoli, a structured finance expert with her own Chicago consulting firm.

She blames the ratings agencies for flawed ratings methodologies. The Fed and the SEC, among other regulators, are just packs of economists and lawyers. "I do not expect lawyers to be rigorous in their analysis."

Regulators saw warning signs as early as 2005, but failed to pursue them. Bear Stearns (nyse: BSC - news - people ), in its first quarter 2005 financial disclosure, said it faced the threat of a civil enforcement action in connection with its pricing, valuation and analysis of $63 billion worth of CDOs. In the same filing, Bear Stearns said it was contacted by the New York State attorney general, then Eliot Spitzer, about $16 billion worth of CDOs it sold to an unnamed client.
The inquiries were brought up again in the August quarterly regulatory report and in the year-end 2005 filing, when Bear Stearns said it was "continuing to respond to subpoenas and other requests for information from regulatory and law enforcement officials."
But that's the last time Bear Stearns brought it up, suggesting the matter had been sidelined or dropped. Aguirre says it sounds fishy. "I find it troubling," he says.

Aguirre has his own beef with the SEC. He was fired in 2005 after aggressively pursuing an insider trading case against Pequot Capital, the powerful New York hedge fund. Aguirre, who says he was fired after trying to interview current Morgan Stanley (nyse: MS - news - people ) Chief Executive John Mack in the matter, says the agency is too close to the industry it covers to be effective as a watch dog. A spokesman for the SEC wouldn't comment for this story.

Others say it's just a matter of things spiraling out of control more quickly than anyone could imagine. "It's very late in the game to be pointing fingers," said Howard Pitkin, Commissioner of Banking in Connecticut. "We all need to sharpen our pencils as far as spotting these problems."
On Friday, Massachusetts securities regulators filed a civil fraud suit against Merrill Lynch over $14 million worth of collateralized debt obligations it sold to the town of Springfield. The state claims the CDOs were unsuitable and sold without the town's consent. (Merrill has acknowledged the latter and paid the town back in full for the investment, which is now practically worthless.)
Earlier last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation disclosed it had opened criminal fraud probes into 14 companies over their mortgage securitization activities, which includes everything from originating loans to buying them, packaging them and selling them to investors. The FBI didn't identify the companies.

Connecticut and New York attorneys general have also opened investigations into how Wall Street structured and sold mortgage-laden securities.

Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ), Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns have disclosed in their recent regulatory filings that they have been questioned by multiple regulators about their activities involving subprime mortgage securities. In November, Merrill Lynch said the SEC had initiated an inquiry into its subprime mortgage portfolio. All the banks have said they are cooperating. Maybe they should shore up their risk management while they're at it.

Wachovia sells $3.5 billion in preferred shares

NEW YORK, Feb 6 - Wachovia Corp (WB.N: Quote, Profile, Research) said on Wednesday that it sold $3.5 billion of preferred shares as the bank looks to rebuild its capital position.
The preferred shares pay a dividend of 7.98 percent for 10 years, and then change to floating interest rates. The shares may be redeemed after 10 years.
Wachovia's Tier 1 capital ratio, a measure of capital strength, was 7.2 percent at Dec. 31. This issue would essentially raise that ratio to 7.9 percent. (Reporting by Dan Wilchins, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)